Security Controls Framework
If you struggle to translate external standards or customer security questionnaires into actionable steps, we can help.
We work with you to map external requirements to your internal technical controls, creating a structured control framework that guides implementation and provides consistent, evidence-backed responses to auditors. This allows your team to focus on running and developing the business rather than repeatedly interpreting compliance requirements.
Security Controls Framework
Our Approach
Control Mapping
We map internal controls to industry frameworks like NIST CSF, CIS Critical Controls, and CSA CCM. This gives a clear structure for understanding coverage, identifying gaps, and reusing controls across multiple standards.
Dual-Level Control Definitions
Controls are defined at two levels:
- External-facing: High-level descriptions for regulators, auditors, and customers.
- Internal-facing: Detailed guidance for implementation, testing, and validation.
Consistency & Reuse
Once defined, the same internal control can address multiple customer requirements or regulatory standards, reducing duplicated effort and audit fatigue.
Framework Alignment
Mapping to recognized frameworks (e.g., CSA CCM, NIST CSF) provides a common language for security and helps demonstrate compliance efficiently.
Example
Mapping Cyber Essentials controls to CSA CCM domains allows organizations to:
- Track compliance across multiple frameworks.
- See overlaps with NIST, CIS, or customer-specific requirements.
- Scale controls without rework.
Client Value
- Reduce audit fatigue with a single source of truth.
- Ensure accuracy and consistency in evidence and reporting.
- Enable proactive security management rather than reactive compliance.